blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9512021.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %MULTI-DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE OBJECTS RELATIONSHIPS+951202 %ORTHOGONAL CHARACTERS CONFLICT RESOLUTION EVIL+951202 %PERCEPTION APPROACH ASSUMPTION IDEAL VALUE 951202 We live in multi-dimensional universes of objective and reflexive relationships. Scientists before Albert Einstein analyzed the objective universe in terms of only three objective dimensions. Since Einstein developed his Special and General Theories of Relativity, it has been common for scientists to analyze the objective universe in terms of four or more objective dimensions; e.g., including time as a fourth dimensions in terms of which to talk about the "coordinates of an event" along with three orthogonal other coordinates such as latitude, longitude and elevation. In another pattern of coordinates, scientists use the four coordinates (x, y, z, t) where t represents time. Other times the four coordinates may be written down as (x, y, z, ict) where i represents the square root of the negative unit number and c represents the speed of light. Each system of dimensions/coordinates is especially suitable for the analysis of certain phenomena; e.g., high speed phenomena, ultra small phenomena, ultra large phenomena, objective phenomena, reflexive phenomena, intimate relationships, alienative relationships, conflicts, cooperation, etc. People who analyze various phenomena come to diverse conclusions regarding the phenomena, due to the diverse ways in which they approach the phenomena in terms of their chosen multi-dimensional coordinates. They may be talking about the same events, relationships and realities in quite different ways --- due to the differences in categories, vocabularies, assumptions, beliefs, coordinates, and attitudes with which they approach the events, relationships and realities. Some people may label events, relationships and realities as "evil" because of the paths, ways, roads, approaches, categories, vocabularies, assumptions, beliefs, coordinates and attitudes with which they have approached the events, relationships and realities. A real-estate agent wanting to sell a house in a racially mixed neighborhood will drive the prospective customer to the house along roads through the best part of the neighborhood near the house---taking care not to approach the house on roads through the deteriorated parts of the neighborhood of the house. Thus the buyer will perceive the house to be in a "good" neighborhood. Beware the real-estate agent who opposes the buyer driving around the house in "circle" of increasing radius and who opposes the buyer flying over the house and around the house at different elevations and radii of exploration. Similarly, beware of people who limit their own and other people's dimensionality of exploration of the neighborhood of controversial events, relationships and realities. This is especially true of events, relationships and realities pertaining to opening up or closing down channels of communication pertaining to: intimacy, openness, honesty, spirituality, religion, affection and sexuality. Similarly, for clarification and confusion; repressing and liberating, etc. Wisdom is not promoted by ignorance and confusion, but by widening dimensions of exploration and clarification; not by exclusivity and specialization, but by inclusivity and integration. People with diverse kinds of knowledge need to be included and integrated in decision making. Exclusive specialists are not well qualified to guide decision making in controversial situations. People who become familiar with events, relationships and realities may label them "good" or "evil" depending upon both the dimensionality of the "space" through which they pass in their approach to the events, relationships and realities---and upon particular "places" within the multi-dimensional space. Some people may label certain events, relationships and realities as "evil" because they have always experienced them within the context of a set of dimensions which is so limited as to make the paths to those events, relationships and realities pass through highly objectionable "neighborhoods". Yet, other people who live in a world of more dimensions can openly and honestly report that in their experience they have approached the same events, relationships and realities along paths and in ways which are without exception characterized by personal and communal integrity. We need to become open, and remain open, to the possibility that our differences in perceptions of the nature of events, relationships and realities may originate in the differences in the dimensionality of the universes in which we have chosen to live our lives. There are as many different universes of experience---as there are different people and different patterns of paths, ways, roads, approaches, assumptions, categories, vocabularies, beliefs, coordinates and attitudes with which people approach the events, relationships and realities of their lives. In light of the above --- when people differ with each other about how "good" or "evil" some events, relationships and realities are---it will be wise and prudent to seek to discover the differences in the patterns of paths, ways, roads, approaches, assumptions, categories, vocabularies, beliefs, coordinates and attitudes with which people approach the events, relationships and realities of their lives. Not all events, relationships and realities are objectively real in ways which are independent of the observers and the ways in which the observers approach and perceive them. It is not wise to pretend otherwise. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================