blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/b0404301.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ==========================================================

=====> See what editing of this essay will come later. <======

%IMPROPER INTIMATE OPEN HONEST BALANCED MUTUAL SINS 040430 %CIVIL HOSPITABLE GRACIOUS GENEROUS SHARING LOVERS 040430 %UNCONVENTIONAL CONFORMITY PROPRIETY FORMALITY GODS 040430 %CRITERIA OUTSIDERS OUTSIDER PARTICIPANTS CRITICS 040430 %SEXUAL ABUSE DOMINATION SYSTEM FALLEN POWERS BEING 040430 %FRIENTLY TOGETHER PRIVACY RIGHTS RITUALS COLLUSION 040430 By what criteria can outsiders to a relationship which is: open, honest, balanced, mutual, and entails intimate dialogue --- be able to show properly that the intimate-relationship is "improper" --- if each of the participants in the relationship say that it is a proper relationship because ALL of the following are true: 1. The relationship is mutual, open, honest & balanced. 2. Within it power and wealth are fairly shared. 3. Within it there is no coercion or violence. 4. Participants demonstrate personal integrity. 5. No participant is forced to conform in any way. 6. Participants are of legal age for intimacies. 7. No formal charges have been properly presented. 8. Within it no participant is domineering. 9. All participants are gentile, kind & patient. 10. All participants are civil, healthy & gracious. Can proper criteria by which such a relationship is shown to be "improper" require that we call attention to differences among the participants relating to some of the following? 1. Race, 2. City, State or Nationality, 3. Religious affiliation or beliefs, 4. Political affiliation or convictions, 5. Heritage, 6. Culture, 7. Education, 8. Location of birth, 9. Family wealth and power, 10. Sexuality? 11. Rights to not being embarrassed? 12. Rights to not admit being involved in mistakes? 13. Rights to being invulnerable at others' expense? 14. Rights to being dominant at others' expense? 15. Rights to luxuries enjoyed at others' expense? Can any formal law by which such a relationship is shown to be "improper" --- properly entail calling attention to differences among the participants relating to ANY of the above aspects of the participants --- and the law still be in keeping with our international declarations of human rights? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================