blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9410181.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %CONFLICT DEFINITIONS NATURE DISAGREE VALUES EVIL+941018 %LISTEN DESCRIBE MUTUAL SATISFACTION AGREE HONEST+941018 %RESOLVE TRANSCEND ESCAPE PRISON COLLUSION ADDICT+941018 %TERRORIST WAR MILITARY PREPARE WEAPONS VIOLENCE+941018 %OBJECTIVE SUBJECTIVE REFLEXIVE 941018 We cannot resolve our conflicts so long as we are in conflict over our respective definitions of what it is that we are in conflict over. To resolve our conflicts we must first agree to work toward agreement about just what are the issues, ideals, values, principles and desires over which we have conflicts. We cannot agree upon what it is that we are in conflict about, until we have really listened to each other try to explain what issues, ideals, values, principles and desires play central roles in our experiences of conflict. We cannot agree on how to resolve our conflicts, until we can explain to each other's satisfaction what each other's perspectives are, regarding the issues, ideals, values, principles and desires which play central roles in our conflicts. We cannot agree on how to resolve our conflicts until we can agree on the most significant objective facts regarding the historic events which play central roles in our respective memories of the history of our conflicts. If we are in conflict about whether to be honest about our communal past, we cannot be fully honest about our communal present or future. In the absence of such basic honesty we cannot resolve our conflicts. It is dishonest to pretend otherwise. We cannot resolve our conflicts until we can explain to each other's satisfaction what each other's reflexive perspectives are regarding the most significant objective facts of the historic events which play central roles in our respective memories of the history of our conflicts. Such explanations are reflexive explanations, not objective descriptions. The explanations reflect back and forth between us, in ways which we cannot detach from through objective withdrawal. We may be in conflict over whether we must be objective in such explanations; if so, we cannot resolve our conflicts until we agree on the nature of our conflict. We cannot resolve our conflicts unless we are agreed that it is desirable for us to resolve our conflicts. If we are in conflict over whether it is desirable to resolve our conflicts---then we cannot resolve our conflicts. If some of us firmly believe that the continuation of our conflicts is desirable---then to that extent we cannot resolve our conflicts. Before we can resolve our conflicts we must work to make it evident to all people who have the power to continue our conflicts that it is to everybody's advantage to resolve our conflicts. See the next essay. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================