blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9209161.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %IMPORTANT RELIGIOUS LEAD CONTROL IGNORANCE THEORY 920916 It is important to note that some religious leaders operate in terms of a paradigm wherein they who claim not to be participating in certain kinds of activities, also claim to have superior knowledge regarding how best to participate in those activities. Their claims presumably involve theoretical knowledge which they claim to have with assured certainty that gives them the right to be in control of other people's lives. It seems reasonable to suggest that such behavior is part of the pervasive human pattern of addiction to trying to be in control of self and others; and to dishonest efforts to maintain the appearance of success in such unsuccessful efforts. Addicts seek to appear to achieve various kinds of perfection, including perfect avoidance of behavior which they regard as taboo; and so the grounds for rejection, alienation, excommunication, disfellowship and/or banishment from their human community of open and honest decalogue. This type of addictive behavior makes no sense because it leads to the break-down of personal and communal integrity---which break-down is clearly evil. It is even more non-when addicts who claim not to be participating in certain types of behavior lay claim to superior knowledge (on purely theoretical grounds) regarding how best to participate in such activities; and lay down legalistic rules regarding which forms of participation in such behavior are appropriate grounds for rejection, alienation, excommunication, disfellowship and/or banishment from their human "community of open and honest dialogue." How open and honest can people be in dialogue about their experience in participating in such behavior, when they are threatened with excommunication due to the influence of powerful people who presume to have appropriate power, to control other people's behavior under circumstances of claimed ignorance regarding current involvement in such kinds of behavior? In the absence of open and honest dialogue about experiences with such behaviors, how can people be well informed about the consequences of such behaviors? How are theoretical hypotheses to be openly and honestly tested, discussed, and be shown to be true or false under such circumstances? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================