blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9010132.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %IDEAL AUTO REGULATE LIMITS ZEN CHANGE ENVIRONMENT 901013 There are limits to the possibilities of auto- regulation. There must be principles which determine the purpose of auto-regulation. To be viable such principles must be flexible enough to deal with changing environmental and internal circumstances. Static principles of auto-regulation are suitable only to a static environment. Yet the operation of profound principles of auto-regulation by a dominant form of life on a finite planet will change the planet's environment and confront the profound principles of auto-regulation with new situations for which the profound principles were not designed. Humans operating in terms of fixed principles are not well suited to survive in an environment which is being changed due to their following of those fixed principles. Scientific procedures cannot discover fixed principles in terms of which to lead the human endeavor. All that the scientific paradigm seeks to discover is fixed by the nature of objective reality. The only objective principles which the scientific paradigm can lead us to discover, are principles fixed by the nature of objective reality. The scientific paradigm is not suited to lead the way towards the discovery of principles in terms of which to set human priorities with regards to the consequences of the scientific paradigm. Such wisdom must originate outside of the limited context of the scientific paradigm, and serve to lead members of the human community to give guidance to scientists and technocrats; guidance which should not be expected to originate within the confines of the scientific and technocratic paradigm. The way of Zen points to considerations which are complementary to the considerations of the scientific and technocratic paradigm. Tragic consequences may be avoided through balanced consideration of complimentary paradigms. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================