blog traffic analysis
This is Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP REFRAIN REPRESS OPEN HONESTY 030222 %DESIRES VISIONS FANTASIES HOPES ASPIRATIONS EVILS 030222 %INTIMACIES FRIENDSHIP PRETENTIOUS MOTIVATION GODS 030222 %DISCERN EXPOSE REVEAL FEAR MENTAL ILLNESS DISEASE 030222 %POWER CONCENTRATION CORRUPTION UNDERSTAND SUBVERT 030222 %ESSENTIAL FOUNDATIONS PERSONAL COMMUNAL INTEGRITY 030222 Is it possible to present an informed and well reasoned case --- for people who are involved with each other in a sexual relationship --- to be required to refrain from being open and honest with each other about their: desires, visions, fantasies, hopes, aspirations --- as regards intimacies. If so, upon what information and logical processes is that case to be made? If such a presentation is pretentious; not based on true information and sound reasoning, what are the motivations, "reasons" and considerations which may be motivating, driving, and guiding the pretentious presentation? 1. Fears that the true lovers will discern/expose "The Domination System" by virtues of being in Love? If so, why should they not discern/expose "The Domination System"? What purpose will be served by leaving "The Domination System" beyond the realm of discernment and exposure? 2. Fears that being in Love will undermine reliable discernment and reasoning? If so, why so? 3. Fear that "being in Love" will be the end of being "in control". If so, what is to be feared in the loss of being "in control"? 4. Are there other distinctive kinds of fears that may be operative? If so, are they legitimate concerns and reasons? Which attitudes, outlooks, and assumptions in regard to the above questions demonstrate the highest levels of personal and communal integrity? Might there be other attitudes, outlooks, and assumptions which will ultimately demonstrate higher levels of personal and communal integrity --- than have yet been demonstrated? If the answer is no; on what basis is that answer offered? What is the motivation, logic and reasoning --- in terms of which such a response can be shown to demonstrate both personal and communal integrity. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================