blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9411211.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %DEFER DICHOTOMY BINARY CONFLICT DEBATE VOTE MOTION+941121 %PRIORITY ROLL CALL VOTES COMMITTEE REPORT WITHHELD+941121 %PARLIAMENTARY LAW RULES REGULATIONS 941121 It is not always virtuous, commanded or required that we engage in dichotomous/binary: conflicts, parliamentary motions, debates or votes. It is often prudent, wise, and proper to defer dichotomous/binary: conflicts, motions, debates and votes. Such deferral may occur by just focusing our attention upon more productive activities, conversations and work; and thus simply and wisely neglecting to focus our attention upon unproductive dichotomous/binary: conflicts, parliamentary motions, debates or votes. The possibility of such unproductive processes need not be mentioned or demonstrated. There need be no requirement to focus our attention upon such unproductive processes. Such unproductive processes may be avoided by the use of priority voting in formal or informal ways. It is wise to list formally or informally those kinds of ways in which we may wish to spend our time---putting the alternatives clearly in front of us. Then it is wise to ask formally or informally---which among the many alternatives most merit our attention, dedication and energy? The question need not be put asking for a YES or a NO on each alternative in turn. The question can easily be put, "Upon which few among these many do you really want to focus your time, money, energies and dedication." We may then say YES to just a few, and deliberately and wisely neglect to give any attention to many alternatives. Not only is it wise and prudent to neglect to give any attention to many dichotomous/binary conflicts, motions, debates and votes. It is also wise and prudent to neglect to give any attention to many integrative efforts and affirmations. We do not have time, energy and money to dedicate to all possible alternatives. We, because of our finitude, must each decide to focus our time, energy and money upon a limited number of alternatives. There is no commandment worthy of respect or support which requires us to dissipate our time, energy and money unproductively upon more alternatives than we can deal with. We are fools if we dissipate ourselves acting as if there were such a commandment worthy of our respect and/or support. When people do demand that we spend our time, energy and money unproductively upon alternatives upon which there is no consensus, and regarding which a majority agrees that a consensus is not clearly at hand---then those people who wish to make such demands should have the courage to declare their demands openly and publicly; rather than through secret votes. They should make it a matter of public record that they demand that others spend their time, money and energies as they recommend. In formal meetings their votes should be recorded as a matter of policy in order to discourage them from making such demands unless they have the conviction and courage which will lead them to make their demands publicly. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================