blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/b0807041.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== Click on WELCOME for a quick tour of essayz.com ========================================================== %EXERCISE PRUDENCE LESSON PLANS TEACHING CONFLICT 080704 %MITIGATION TEAMS TWO THREE REPRESENT PERSPECTIVES 080704 %ACCURATELY REASONS ENDURING CONFLICT ALIENATION IT 080704 %TRAGIC IDEOLOGIES DOMINEERING BULLIES WARS TERRORS 080704 One kind of exercise which may prove useful in teaching a class on Conflict-MITIGATION is to have paired teams composed of two or three students who are assigned the task of trying to represent the point of view of each of the sides in an enduring conflict --- in the manner of students participating in a Model-UN exercise and trying to represent the points of view of differing nations in a conflicted situation. Each team of two or three students would research some of the points of view within a conflict of whatever chosen kind; not necessarily between nations. Another team of two or three students would research the points of view of opposing sides in the same conflict. In the manner of a Model-UN session, the teams would alternate in representing the points of view of their chosen sides in the chosen conflict --- seeking ways to MITIGATE the conflict by clarifying the conflict and/or facilitating open and honest dialogue; rather than trying to win a debate or to prove the other sides wrong or inferior or dishonorable. The purpose of the above would be to illustrate effective ways of Mitigating-Alienations within the context of particular chosen conflicts. This would entail all participants becoming Informed-About, Criticizing and Describing the following aspects Of-Each-Of-The-Diverse- Sides-in-the-Conflict; whether Two-or-More. 1. Each-Side's-Contrasting: assumptions, attitudes, convictions, fears, conceptual-paradigms, perspectives, anxieties, strengths, bargaining-assets, kinds of power, kinds of wealth, confusions, ignorance, avoidances, insensitivities, lacks, collusions, etc. 2. Each-Side's-Conflicting: Perceptions of other-sides': Weaknesses, Strengths, Flaws, Vulnerabilities, Mis- representations, Motivations, Ideals, Intentions, etc. 3. Ways to Mitigate-the-Alienations/Conflicts involved in the situation which is the focus of the study --- in the manner of Finding-Common-Ground in Getting to YES, Getting Past NO and Getting Together (Roger Ficher with William Ury or Scott Brown) Be-Together in the Many-Gracious Ways of Shalom. (c) 2008 by Paul A. Smith in "Search for Honesty and Integrity" (On Being Yourself Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================