blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/b0407172.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %UNTIE GORDIAN KNOT INSIDE OUTSIDE REJECT INCLUDED 040717 %UNITED COHERENT COOPERATE CONTEND COLABORATE JUDGE 040717 %PERSONAL COMMUNAL REPRESSIONS DEPRESSION SUPPRESS 040717 %DISTINGUISH PRUDENT WISE CAUTION TRUE LOVERS FEARS 040717 %RESPONSE INITIATIVE UNILATERAL DOMINATION COLLUDE 040717 %PUBLIC PRIVATE INTIMACIES SEXUALITY PLEASURES SINS 040717 It is difficult to untie Gordian-Knots of personal and communal repressions because: 1. It is often difficult to distinguish reliably between prudent and wise cautions on our part as integrative and free True-Lovers; and fearful responses to actions which are unilaterally demanded by and/or are guided by: "The Domination System", conspirators, collusions, colluders, addictions, addicts, codependents, dictators, tyrants, emperors, etc. 2. It is often difficult to distinguish reliably between: (a) real-objective-physical-actions, (b) intentional-planning-for-real-objective- physical-actions, (c) accidental-day-dreams related to the above, (d) repressed-day-dreams of the above kinds, (e) guilt-ridden-day-dreams, (d) individually-enjoyed-day-dreams, (e) True-Lovers-Enjoying their day-dreams, (f) True-Lovers-Fulfilling their day-dreams, (g) Private and public differences in the above, (h) Privately or publicly doing the above, (i) Privately or publicly advocating the above, (j) Privately/publicly prohibiting the above, (k) Trying to police/enforce such prohibitions. (l) The objectively possible and impossible. (m) The reflexively possible and impossible. (n) The legally possible and impossible. (o) The spiritually possible and impossible. (p) Integrative and disintegrative behaviors. So also it is hard to distinguish between: 3. True-Lovers' integrative refusals to be dominated in alienative ways; and domineering-people' demands that "different-people" conform "properly" in alienative ways. Or between: 4. "Clear and Present Objective Dangers" and the subjective fears of people who are domineering, paranoids, mentally-ill, alienated, alienators, disconnected, out-of- touch, emotionally-immature, excommunicated, isolated, etc. 5. We are prone to insist exclusively upon our own most-favored-way as regards formal-or-informal-procedures, and definitions of: ideals, values, virtues, vices, true- paradoxes, idolatry, righteousness, conformity, integrity, evil-relationships, evil-people, enemies, terrorists, etc. 6. In fear we are loath to honor True-Lovers'-Rights to privacy, intimacy, and Being-In-Love. 7. We confuse "The Domination System" with God. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================