blog traffic analysis
This is Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %ABSOLUTE TRUTH TRUE LOVERS AFFIRMATIONS STATEMENTS 030728 %CERTAINTY CONFIDENCE LEVELS PROBABILITIES FACTS 030728 %QUANTUM MECHANICS WAVE PACKETS WAVICLES PHOTONS 030728 %PHONONS GRAVITONS SCHROEDINGER DIRAC EQUATIONS SIN 030728 %ARROGANCE SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS HUBRIS HUMILITY GRACE 030728 %COMPLEMENTARY PERSPECTIVES ALTERNATIVE PATHS FAIL 030728 If some statements/affirmations are ABSOLUTELY TRUE; i.e., represent ABSOLUTE TRUTHS, does it then follow that: 1. Statements/affirmations which are contradictory to those statements/affirmations which are ABSOLUTELY TRUE --- must be ABSOLUTELY FALSE; i.e., utterly without redeeming merit? 2. People who insist on making statements and/or affirmations which are contradictory to those statements and/or affirmations which are ABSOLUTELY TRUE --- must be people who are ABSOLUTELY EVIL, utterly without redeeming merit? Can there be ABSOLUTE TRUTHS in the absence of ABSOLUTELY RELIABLE LOGIC by which to recognize with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY of those affirmations/statements which are contradictory to the ABSOLUTE TRUTHS? Are ABSOLUTE TRUTHS the fruits of God's Will, or of the perverse wills of ABSOLUTELY DOMINEERING people and groups who do not and will not tolerate --- spectrums of possibilities, or COMPLEMENTARY TRUTHS and COMPLEMENTARY PATHS --- to those aspects of the whole-truths which mortal humans can apprehend and discern with some clarity? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================