blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/b0207164.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %SOME COMBINATIONS NECESSARY SUFFICIENT REASON LOVE+020716 %HONOR HONEST HUMAN CONFLICT RESOLUTION BALANCE SIN+020716 %MUTUAL ADVANTAGEOUS ALMOST ALL PEOPLE INVOLVED GOD+020716 %FRAME FAIR QUESTIONS DICHOTOMOUS RESPONSES HONESTY+020716 %DOMINATION SYSTEM PREOCCUPATIONS ISSUES CONTROLLER 020716 What are SOME COMBINATIONS OF NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT REASONS for honoring, respecting and supporting HONEST and HUMANE efforts to RESOLVE human CONFLICTS in ways which are BALANCED and MUTUALLY ADVANTAGEOUS to ALMOST all people involved in the conflicts? The above question is framed in terms of SOME- COMBINATIONS --- because there may be a variety of combinations of criteria --- which may be BOTH NECESSARY and SUFFICIENT. There probably is not just one such combination. There probably are a variety of of combinations which merit our honor, respect and support. The Domination System may demand that there be only one such combination --- in order for The Domination System to be God. The above question is framed in terms of REASONS --- because the presence of arbitrary, prejudicial or capricious behavior(s) --- undermine reason and due processes which are essential to continuing personal and communal integrities. They are among the essential foundations for all kinds of foundations for both personal and communal integrities. The above question is framed in terms of HONESTY and HUMANE considerations because in the absence of HONESTY and/or HUMANE considerations --- all forms of personal and communal integrities fall-apart, are-destroyed, become-taboo, are-suspected, and are threats to The Domination System being God. The above question is framed in terms of RESOLVING CONFLICTS, rather than in terms of WINNING BATTLES --- because WINNING BATTLES always leads to both personal-and-communal forms of: resentment, anger, estrangement, dishonesty and disintegrations. The above question is framed in terms of BALANCE and MUTUAL ADVANTAGES because --- in the absence of BALANCE and/or MUTUAL ADVANTAGES --- the concentration of powers, wealth & advantages leads to personal-and-communal kinds of terrifying disintegrations and terrorism. The above question is framed in terms of ALMOST-ALL people involved; rather than in terms of absolutely all people involved --- because the latter would give absolute power to each person involved --- to veto progress towards the resolution of any conflict --- if the resolution of the conflict would undermine the powers of The Domination System to be in control of "things", as is often the case. We need to recognize that people are involved in conflicts by virtue of them suffering the consequences of the conflicts; as well as by virtue of being contenders for: power, wealth, territory, rights and/or other advantages. We need to recognize that gracious people who come to agreements regarding possible mutually agreeable responses to the above framed question --- are thereby threats to the continued respect, honor, and support of The Domination System; and so such gracious people are likely to be targeted by domineering people as intolerable-people; not worthy of even tolerance; and certainly not worthy of respect, honor or support. Thus such gracious people are likely to be the targets of coercive and/or violent attacks. Such attacks are successful if they provoke any in-kind-responses. The Enemy-Wins when in-kind reasons do occur. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================