blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/b0203062.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %HUMAN CONTROL CONSEQUENCES CIRCUMSTANCES ACTIONS+020306 %DETERMINATION DEFINITION OUTCOMES RESPONSES SINS+020306 %INTERACTIONS RELATIONSHIPS REACTIONS RESENTMENT+020306 %RESISTANCE REBEL CAUSE EFFECT PASS LEGISLATION LAW+020306 %DESCRIPTIONS PROSCRIPTIONS PRESCRIPTIONS SCRIPTURE+020306 %SHOULD OUGHT MUST OBEY LOYAL DOMINATION SYSTEMS 020306 What kinds of consequences can humans make follow certain kinds of previous circumstances? What kinds of determinations can be controlled by humans; i.e., determinations in the sense of controlling outcomes of previous actions, circumstances, relationships, events, interactions, reactions, etc? What kinds of cause-effect relationships can humans be in control of; and what other kinds of cause-effect relationships can humans NOT be in control of? What kinds of laws of cause-effect can humans pass, legislate, control, etc?, and what other kinds of laws of cause-effect can humans NOT be in control of? What are the differences between "laws" which describe sequences of cause-and-effect that occur without exception and without human: choice, desire, action, intention, fear, anxiety, etc? --- and others that occur only because of some human: choice, desires, action, intention, fear, anxiety, prescription? What are the differences between human descriptions which entail no attempt to be in control of sequences of cause-effect relationships; and other human prescriptions which entail many human attempts to be in control of certain sequences of cause-effect relationships? Legislators in one sense "determine" what shall be the consequences of a citizen doing some forbidden action; i.e., prescribe the consequence of a citizen disobeying a law which they "pass". Pure scientific researchers in another sense "determine" what is always the consequence of some particular circumstance/relationship --- and then describe what are always the consequences of that said particular circumstances and/or relationships. (Above "pure" is to be understood in the sense of being independent of "applications", of efforts to cause certain things to happen for utilitarian reasons due to human desires and fears.) Pure religious leaders in another sense "determine" what "should" always be the consequences of particular human desires, fears, decisions, actions, thoughts, intimacies, relationships, etc. They often differ as to what they mean when they use/see words such as "determine", "consequences", "should", "ought" "law", etc. --- in comparison to what scientists mean when they use the very same words in the context of the work of scientists working in laboratory settings. How can they come to understand what each other means? What if they do not do so? What then happens? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================