blog traffic analysis
This is Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %PRIVACY PRINCIPLES DOMINATION SYSTEM CONTROLS SINS+000514 %LEGITIMATE COMPLAINT CONCERN THOUGHTS FEARS ACTION+000514 %INVASION OBJECTION IMMATURE PARANOIA EMBARRASSMENT 000514 It is difficult for a community to protect its members against disintegrative invasions of privacy when there is no consensus upon the principles behind privacy rights. Should people have the right to make atomic bombs in private? Hardly! Should people have the right to spread diseases and abuse vulnerable people in private? Hardly? Usually there is general agreement on such questions. The situation is different when it comes to some religious leaders' notions of what should be, and what should not be, privacy rights regarding: attitudes, assumptions, desirers, hopes, aspirations, beliefs, etc. Some religious leaders' indicate by their behaviors that they are unwilling to grant any such privacy rights. Do they have legitimate concerns; or are they in fact closet supporters of "The Domination System". What principles are they behaving in terms of when they fail to grant people any privacy rights? Is there any sense in which their behaviors are supportive of both the personal and communal integrity of people who are seeking to understand, expose and subvert "The Domination System"? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================