blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9406041.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %MACHO FEMALE COLLUSION DEFENSE SEX DISCRIMINATE+940604 %RATIONALIZE REASON JUSTIFY EXPLAIN COLLUSION LOVE 940604 It is helpful to consider and talk about the possibility that people who oppose ordaining/installing women in positions of authority and power---do so to protect macho male collusions which pretend that in some important way males are superior to females when it comes to having power, authority, and the possibility of being in control. Such powerful men often oppose even talking about the above mentioned possibility---lest the outcome of the talk be the development of a consensus that a macho collusion is not only possible, but is in fact a reality. The ultimate concern of participants in collusive games of mutual self deception is to protect the dishonesty of their games---perhaps by making key assertions appear to be of divine origin. Thus if there is a collusion it is to be expected that the most powerful beneficiaries of the collusion will most vigorously oppose discussion of the possibility that there is a collusion of a particular kind. Women in positions of authority and power would in many instances undermine the macho male collusion, undermine the exercise of power in support of sexual discrimination and undermine the carefully constructed system by which the dishonesty which is inherent in the collusion is concealed. That is not thinkable and it is not discussible! Curses upon anybody who thinks such thoughts and/or talks about such thoughts. Such behavior cannot be tolerated. People who engage in such behavior must be excommunicated to defend our collusive faith. The above considerations suggest why many people oppose any thoughts and discussion of the possibility that God might be a woman. How are men to relate to God as a female? With God as the supreme authority, it seems right and proper that God be a macho male---at least to macho males it seem right and proper. If God is a Supreme Female, then how are macho males to regard themselves in light of their patterns of abuse of powerless females? That is a sobering thought which we better not think about or talk about; lest macho males get wind of our thoughts and conversations! There are limits to what macho males will tolerate. Freedoms of communication should stay in the Bill of Rights, and not bother us in our day to day lives. Come to think of it, how would macho males' sexual visions, fantasies, and behaviors change; were they to consider themselves to always be in the presence of a God who is a Supreme Female, rather than in the presence of a God who is a Supreme Male, perhaps a Supreme Macho Male? Oh, is that an unfair question? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================